LegalPundit
a loopy world of legalese
a loopy world of legalese
Ashcroft v. Iqbal and United States v. Husayn Supreme Court’s two cases, Ashcroft v. Iqbal and United States v. Husayn has some uncanny similarities. Both Iqbal and Husayn are Muslims wanting to hold the United States responsible for the suffered brutal ill treatment, call it torture. They both blamed very senior
“This is a Christian nation,” thundered the Supreme Court in a case in 1892 “officially” reminding the country based on “volume of unofficial declarations.” Rector, etc. of Church of the Holy Trinity v. United States, 143 U.S. 457, 471 (1892).
Bankruptcy Judge Grossman, an able judicial mind, decisive with words and wisdom has authored an intelligent judgment. In re Anelia Teherneva, Case No. 19-71413-reg (EDNY, Feb. 28, 2022). The decision cuts off loss-mitigation from the court’s practice or rather judicial indulgence. Yes, it was an indulgence, as this loss-mitigation, a judicially crafted one was and
“This is a Christian nation,” thundered the Supreme Court in a case in 1892 “officially” reminding the country based on “volume of unofficial declarations.” Rector, etc. of Church of the Holy Trinity v. United States, 143 U.S. 457, 471 (1892).
So, you are very unhappy with your lawyer. Or the opposing side lawyer for that matter, who might not have played by the rules in your case. You might have a claim against him.
Stay tuned for further insights.
Stay tuned for further insights.